bah, i shouldn't post that early in the morning after getting too little sleep. :}
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 07:35:37AM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 06:54:08PM +0200, Daniel Calviño Sánchez wrote: > > Moreover, KTutorial can't be uploaded to KDE repositories. > > > i wonder why you chose to reply to my email, if you are just ignoring > the content. the above sentence is FUD, that simple. the only place that > is really taboo is kdelibs - which is kinda irrelevant, as it is going > to be split up into separate modules anyway (at least logically). if you > want to be anti-proprietary, you can have it. you just won't get a "kde > platform" label on it. > ok, forget that part. it was relating to the deliberation gpl vs. lgpl, but you obviously aren't even considering lgpl. > the gpl 2 vs 3 question is orthogonal to that, and depends solely on the > license compatibility of particular applications. you got that part > right. > in fact, the licensing policy for kde repos requires at least as liberal as gpl2 for *any* code, so the choice is already made. why it imposes this requiremnt on new code is beyond me, but whatever. the idea to make it gpl3 + gpl2 exception is pointless, as it would effectively make it gpl2 anyway. so have fun writing your script. ;) >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
