On Saturday, 2011-10-01, Rui Maciel wrote: > On 09/30/2011 03:03 PM, Myriam Schweingruber wrote: > > Well yes, it is feasible, provided the database is completely triaged > > and there are actual people doing the queries, as those need to be > > done by sentient beings. Of course we welcome all volunteer triagers > > to give a hand:) See also my previous post though. > > What do you mean by "completely triaged"? If I'm not mistaken, by > default KDE's bug tracker lists bug reports sorted by report ID, which > is directly proportional to how old a bug report is and therefore "how > long they have been unanswered". This means that if you run a search on > KDE's bug tracker for the bugs filed on a specific project, the first > result that pops out by default is already the report which has been > left unaddressed the longest.
Completely triaged in the sense of someone having weeded out all duplicates, requested and received all necessary additional information [1] and ideally confirmed to happen in a current built-from-source installation similar to what a developer will use when trying to fix it. Being the oldest report for a given product qualifies as an indicator of when a problem occured first, but just its age does not imply that any of these other criteria have been met. Cheers, Kevin [1] and ideally unrelated information removed, some reports accumulate a lot of noise over time. Especially when being linked to from forums and people adding their "me too", even if their problem is actually different. -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
