In data Monday 06 June 2011 19:26:38, Sebastian Kügler ha scritto: (I took the liberty of adding kde-bindings to the CC of tihs specific topic)
> We want to make it possible to use our frameworks in Qt projects without > significant additional dependencies. This means: Reading around the plans and this mails, I'd like to ask if bindings for interpreted languages (aside ECMAScript, which has a more or less official blessing thanks to QtScript and friends), were put into the equation. The reason is simple: those too contribute to lowering the barrier of entry for developers, especially the audience that has not a C++ programming background. If things are adjusted (without breaking things), it would be a perfect opportunity to involve the bindings people in the process. > * The impact for existing apps will be minimal Again, this is also a perfect opportunity to get the bindings team on board, to ensure that the changes will not maim the bindings themselves. Notice that this is not a criticism of what's has been done so far: on the contrary, I think the effort is sorely needed. I would just like to point out the existence of these realities (bindings) that albeit small, contribute their little to the use of KDE. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
