On 05/03/2022 18:16, Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 6:00 AM Stephen Kelly <steve...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 26/02/2022 10:38, Volker Krause wrote:
> On Sonntag, 20. Februar 2022 16:02:59 CET Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The Qt 5 based Grantlee libraries were depended on by some KDE
applications.
>>
>> For Qt 6, I've created a separate repo for KTextTemplate for
one of the
>> Grantlee libraries. The other library is separate and can be
dealt with
>> separately.
>>
>> Currently the code lives here:
>>
>> https://github.com/steveire/ktexttemplate
>>
>> I'd like to get the process moving on getting this reviewed and
into KF6.
>>
>> It's not clear to me what the next step is. I tried googling
terms like
>> "how to submit a library to kde frameworks", but didn't find
anything
>> useful.
>>
>> https://techbase.kde.org/KDE_Frameworks describes how to build
>> frameworks, but not how to submit a new one.
>>
>> I've checked and I can still use invent.kde.org
<http://invent.kde.org>, so it would be good if
>> there is a standard process I can follow for the rest.
> I don't think the process of integrating a so far external
project into
> Frameworks happened often enough for this to be documented as a
streamlined
> process. I'd suggest the following steps:
>
> (1) Import the repo into invent.kde.org <http://invent.kde.org>
> (2) Go through the KDE Review process
> (3) Request inclusion into Frameworks
>
> Happy to see this moving :)
Ok. I was thinking there might be some 'review' area of
invent.k.o, but
I've just made
https://invent.kde.org/skelly/ktexttemplate
Does that satisfy (1)?
It starts the process yes.
I think there are changes like CamelCase headers to conform to KF6
norms. I'm not sure if others can help with that now. Can any KDE
account push to the above repo?
No, only you are able to push to that repository, but people can send
you merge requests.
To give people access to the repository you can either:
a) Invite the teams/kde-developers group to the repository as a
'Developer' which will grant access to it; or
I've done this part now.
I thought I started the KDE Review process when I sent the original
email here, but without a written-down process I'm not certain.
Maybe things can be moved along now?
Thanks,
Stephen.
