El dijous, 27 de maig de 2021, a les 6:10:47 (CEST), Harald Sitter va escriure: > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 7:39 PM Antonio Rojas <nqn1976l...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > El miércoles, 26 de mayo de 2021 13:19:34 (CEST), Harald Sitter escribió: > > > Hola > > > > > > QWE and QtScript in our kde/5.15 branches currently have unaligned > > > versions. > > > > > > QWE 5.15.4: > > > https://invent.kde.org/qt/qt/qtwebengine/-/blob/kde/5.15/.qmake.conf > > > > > > QtBase 5.15.3: > > > https://invent.kde.org/qt/qt/qtbase/-/blob/kde/5.15/.qmake.conf > > > > > > This then breaks version alignment expectations. For example QWECore > > > requires QtWebChannel at the same version but since the versions are > > > misaligned the requirement check changes. > > > > This is because the upstream QWE and QtScripts 5.15 branches are public, > > unlike the other Qt repos. The versioning issue is discussed here: > > > > https://www.qt.io/blog/building-qt-webengine-against-other-qt-versions > > > > Lowering the version number would be misleading since this is the real, > > upstream 5.15 code, which is post-5.15.4 already. > > I suppose then we need to fix the cmake check?
That would be one of the patches that would make some sense even if not coming from upstream i guess. Cheers, Albert > > Right now building the lot of our patch collection branches leads to > skrooge not being able to build because of that defect. That seems > silly at the best of times. > > HS >
