Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 15:31:47 CEST Martin Koller a écrit : > On Sunday 27 March 2016 09:21:01 laurent Montel wrote: > > Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 10:57:18 CEST Ben Cooksley a écrit : > > > Hi all, > > > > > > As part of the CI overhaul, we've attempted to perform a complete set > > > of builds for Qt 4, as it's still (unfortunately) used. > > > > > > Sadly, as expected for something nobody has really tried to build for > > > ages, many things don't build. > > > One of those is the entire PIM suite - because Baloo removed it's Qt 4 > > > build metadata (meaning as far as the CI system is concerned, Baloo > > > has no Qt 4 branches and is Qt 5 only) > > > > > > You've two options here: > > > 1) Drop Qt 4 PIM. > > > 2) Reinstate Baloo's Qt 4 branches. > > > > > > I intend to carry out option #1 if there is no response to this. > > > > I vote for #1 too. > > We will not create more release from kdepim4, no distro uses it even > > debian :) > The latest openSuse (Leap 42.1) ships the Qt4 based kdepim, although it uses > plasma5 desktop.
It's opensuse problem :) > > Speaking of it: given that openSuse decided against shipping KF5-based PIM, > how stable is KF5-based PIM considered these days ? > Is it ready for productive daily professional use ? For me yep it's stable with an akonadi better than kde4 akonadi. -- Laurent Montel | laurent.mon...@kdab.com | KDE/Qt Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.fr
