On Saturday 27 December 2014 12:56:27 Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 13:21:37 CEST, Milian Wolff wrote: > > Furthermore, I'd like to use the same review mechanism for > > post-review. When a > > patch is triggering problems, I'd like to start a discussion in > > the context of > > the commit that was merged. Again, I want to annotate source > > lines. So rather > > than sending mails to kde-commits which are then lost, I want to have that > > tracked on a website for others to see. > > Hi, do you also like this action to take some effect on the patch, such as > a revert? I'm a bit worried that there won't be much difference between > comments lost on kde-commits ML and comments lost on $website. That said, I > like the benefit of being sure that the comment at least reaches the people > who authored and reviewed the troublesome change.
No, I don't want to revert from the website. I just want to get have the disccusions out in the public, and have that indexed by search engines and the like. The kde-commits ML is not good for that purpose, imo. Bye -- Milian Wolff m...@milianw.de http://milianw.de
