On sábado, 29 de dezembro de 2012 22.58.49, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Saturday 29 December 2012 11:06:30 David Faure wrote: > > Well, for frameworks that intend to be "as close to Qt as possible" they > > should do the same (for the convenience of developers who don't use > > qmake/cmake but set up their project configuration in their IDE by hand, > > for instance Visual Studio). > > This means re-adding the missing QtWidgets/ in public headers once Qt5 is > > required in KF5. > > Out of curiosity, is it something which got documented in the Qt project? Or > that's more a custom? (doesn't make it less valid, I'm being curious here > and couldn't find the info)
syncqt complains if public headers have Qt includes that aren't in the
<QtModule/ClassName> or <QtModule/classname.h> form.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
