On Tuesday 30 October 2012, John Layt wrote: > On 30 Oct 2012 11:23, "David Jarvie" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, October 30, 2012 11:16 am, David Faure wrote: > > > On Sunday 28 October 2012 09:16:56 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > >> Ok, thanks. > > >> Is this documented somewhere ? > > > > > > No (I described it in an email some time ago, but it's not on any wiki) > > > If you have an idea for where we could document it, I will then push > > other > > > > module maintainers to also write up the git workflow they want to see, > > > since I > > > myself have the same question in other modules. > > > > > > I think community.kde.org would be the right place (it's internal, it > > > doesn't > > > affect KDE app devels outside of git.kde.org), but all I can see about > > git > > > > is > > > http://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/GitKdeOrgManual > > > which is more about the technical setup. > > > > > > Maybe start a new webpage at the toplevel of community.kde.org? > > > GitWorkflowForEachModule? :-) > > > > Wouldn't techbase be more appropriate? It's technical information, plus > > techbase is where other policies are kept. > > > > I must say that the split between community.kde.org and techbase.kde.org > > isn't very satisfactory because the boundaries are blurred, and it's easy > > to miss information if it's in the other one from what you expect it to > > be in. > > We have a section on TecBase for Git related documentation, and I think our
I'm very much for having this on techbase. Personally I can't find anything on community.kde.org except I have the direct link or searching turns up something. > Git workflow is needed information for anyone attempting to access our > repos so belongs on TechBase. See techbase.kde.org/Developmemt/Git where > I've linked under Policy to various proposals. So a section "KDE git workflows" on this page http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Git ? Where it is basically documented how it is currently used ? > We also need to formally > update the old SVN Commit Policy to reflect the new age, I did start on it > but stalled waiting for the kdelibs workflow to be finalised. I have the impression that in the meantime we (...ok, not me) should simply document the current state of things. Alex
