2012/3/14 Lamarque V. Souza <[email protected]>: > Em Wednesday 14 March 2012, Sune Vuorela escreveu: > >> On 2012-03-14, Boudewijn Rempt <[email protected]> wrote: >> > It's easy enough to package -- the opensuse packages I use work >> > perfectly >> > fine, so I cannot imagine that there are any real and relevant problems >> > for other distributions. >> Sure it can be done. but it is just useless churn if it doesn't really >> provide anything that matters to the end user that colord doesn't.
> You are talking as if colord is the default standard and well used in KDE > and then out of a suden comes oyranoes trying to replace it. Colord is not > wide used in KDE and since oyranos includes a wider feature set I guess it > is more usefull for a wider range of users. As said in other e-mails colord > is required in Gnome3, so why not add oyranos to kdegraphics since other KDE > software already work with it? Colord is also integrated with many other parts of the stack. And that Oryanos includes a wider feature-set doesn't necessarily mean it's the better choice. Which other KDE software works with Oryanos already? And btw. colord is a XDG project, not a GNOME project. Yes, it was started by a GNOME developer, but this doesn't make it a GNOME project. It is developed independent from GNOME. Regards, Matthias >> I could package oyranos and the weird things it requires. but in the >> same time I_could probably fix 20 small annoyances for all users and >> package the new nice nepomuk ioslaves. What is the best use of my time? > You devide what is the best use of your time. I still commit patches to > Kopete from time to time even though I know it is going to fade away once we > move to Qt 5 (Kopete still uses Qt3Support in several places). > > > > -- > > Lamarque V. Souza > > KDE's Network Management maintainer > > http://planetkde.org/pt-br
