Hi, We still have some outstanding issues from the Git Workflow meeting a while back (see http://community.kde.org/20110213_GitWorkflowAgenda) which I'd like to see updated.
* Workflow eean, steveire and PovAddict were to draw up alternative workflow proposals, steveire has drawn up one at http://community.kde.org/20110213_GitWorkflowAgenda/StevesIdea (see earlier thread). Do we have the other proposals yet? What needs doing to move this forward? * Release branch naming, KDE/4.6 vs 4.6 This was decided by a coin toss to be 4.6 rather than KDE/4.6, but I suspect by now more people have stable branches from kdelibs/kdebase than the other modules so it may be less disruptive overall to use KDE/4.6? Either way, there's still a couple of outstanding actions: ** Sysadmins to rename the branches that use the losing naming scheme if that's possible without too much disruption ** Sysadmins to block creating new branches for the losing naming scheme. * Documentation I've started the Git documentation: http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Git http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Git/Configuration http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Git/Recipes I've also been revising the TechBase "Getting Started" pages, but that's a separate email. * Commit Template I've finally committed the Commit Template into kdelibs, any Git project that wants to use a different version can commit that to their own repo provided they follow the basic rules. Cheers! John.
