Le 2019-11-30 à 12:39, Paul Brown a écrit :
On sábado, 30 de noviembre de 2019 17:11:07 (CET) Philippe Cloutier wrote:
Thanks Paul,
Le 2019-11-29 à 12:22, Paul Brown a écrit :
On viernes, 29 de noviembre de 2019 13:39:26 (CET) Philippe Cloutier
wrote:
Le 2019-11-27 à 14:05, Aleix Pol a écrit :
Dear KDE community,
Some of you already saw it at Akademy, but we wanted to make sure that
you were all aware of all the great things we did last year 2018
https://ev.kde.org/reports/ev-2018/
Thank you Aleix and everyone involved in producing this report, which is
more extensive than any of this kind I've seen from an open source
project.
What are the proper ways to report issues in this report (or on
ev.kde.org in general)? https://ev.kde.org/contact.php mentions "sending
email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>", but is it
possible to determine if an issue was already reported there?
If you find issues with the report (inaccuracies, spelling mistakes,
etc.), can you post them here?
There is some information I would like to see in the report which is not
there, though I don't know if that can be suggested for a template for
future years. But the main issues I noticed are the following:
* The lack of production or/and publication dates
Production and publication dates of what?
Of the 2018 community report
* The "Streamline the onboarding of new contributors" section links to
https://webchat.kde.org/#/room/#kde-welcome:kde.org
I was not expecting that a "KDE Welcome team" link in an
organization's yearly report would point to some instant messaging
channel, but if that's intentional, I am not sure it was intended to
link to a "welcome" channel which can't even be consulted without an
account.
Well... it links to what it says: to the team. That's where they hang out and
are ready to talk to newcomers and guide them on their way.
If it's really intentional to link to that channel in its
current state, it would surely be less misleading to have that link
labelled "a discussion channel created by the new team" or something
like that.
Only is not a "discussion channel", at least in the sense that is not where
they discuss how to welcome people (that happens elsewhere). It is the place
where they actually welcome people. It is not some sort of meta channel or
anything like that. I am not sure what you would have preferred I link to.
Well, if it's a channel where people are welcomed through discussion,
it's a discussion channel, but I was not saying that "a discussion
channel created by the new team" is the best label possible, just
suggesting one way to solve that.
To clarify my comment, what I was expecting for the current label is
either a list of team members, or a page *about* the team ( such as
https://wiki.debian.org/DAManager ).
[...]
Cheers
Paul
--
Philippe Cloutier
http://www.philippecloutier.com
