https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #47 from Michael Miller <michael_mil...@msn.com> --- (In reply to Jonathan from comment #45) > So I installed the newest version from today, and cleared the training data. > The recognition seems to be better. The false positives seemed to drop > significantly. > Digikam doesn't seem to group similar faces if an existing name hasn't been > setup. > > Can digikam see and read the google picasa face tags? I'm not sure it does > because I should have more matches. > > Unfortunately I still have 99,000 unmatched faces. Many are generic crowd > faces, but I'm sure there are plenty of faces that could be matched. It's > going to take awhile to review them. Hi Jonathan, I'm happy face matching is working better for you. Because of the additive nature of the system, you should run recognition after you approve new face suggestions. digikam should find more faces that match. If you keep the recognition accuracy above 7 you shouldn't get any false-positives, or at least very, very few. This should help sort through the faces you know. Digikam groups the face thumbnails based on the folder and image the face was found it. With the new recognition models, you should only need to manually tag or two faces with a name and digikam will find the rest. Keep in mind you may have to run recognition a few times, approving the suggestions after each time to match all the faces. I'll check about using the Picasa tags. It will really depend on the "box" they Google uses for the face, and how easy it will be to translate that to the digikam box. I probably won't have a chance to look into it until this weekend at the earliest. Unfortunately, we can't use 2 names for the same tag. That would require a very significant rewrite of huge portions of the tagging and face recognition engine. You could always add a second tag to image. Maybe tag the image with "Star Trek". Then you can search for all "Star Trek" images that also have "William Shatner". Cheers, Mike -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
