https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
--- Comment #15 from Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> --- (In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #13) > Created attachment 174732 [details] > Patch to activate caling the ada demangler > > I'm triggering ada demangling based on the presence of > __gnat_ada_main_program_name rather than any prefix. O, clever. I like that. Patch looks good. (In reply to Philippe Waroquiers from comment #14) > For what concerns suppressions: our suppressions are using mangled names. > The user manual documents explicitly for c++ that mangled names have to be > used for suppressions. Suppression matching is not calling the demangler > (see m_errormgr.c foComplete). > This is calling VG_(get_fname_no_cxx_demangle). I will imagine that then no > demangler at all will be called. O, you are right. I forgot. Thanks. > So, if ever the Ada demangler is made working, I do not think that this will > impact suppression matching Lets try out Paul's patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
