https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481069
--- Comment #49 from Sdar <s...@vivaldi.net> --- (In reply to Christoph Feck from comment #47) > > Idk how this works. > > In KDE, any contributor can raise concern about any part of the code. David > rightfully wrote that the notification server is the correct place to > execute external applications, instead of the client process that issued the > notification. No other contributor objected, so it is perfectly OK that > David rejected the patch in the current form. Wouldn’t it be better to merge this as it is and replace it with a better alternative once it’s ready, rather than leaving it in limbo for who knows how long? Doesn't seem to cause issues or performance problems, there's no technical issues aside from "this would be better here instead of there", it's already ready and it's based on code that worked well during, afaik, quite a long time and is not even that much code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
