https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490859

            Bug ID: 490859
           Summary: Image color profile is not taken into account when
                    creating thumbnails for 16 bit tiffs
    Classification: Applications
           Product: digikam
           Version: 8.4.0
          Platform: Other
                OS: Other
            Status: REPORTED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: NOR
         Component: Thumbs-Engine
          Assignee: digikam-bugs-n...@kde.org
          Reporter: harri...@gmail.com
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 172012
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=172012&action=edit
Sample images and screenshots

SUMMARY
The thumbnails for those 16 bit tiff files that have an embedded color profile
other than sRGB have incorrect colors. This does not seem to depend on which
color profile is used or which application created the image. The image itself
opens correctly in preview and in the editor. Only the thumbnail colors are
incorrect.

Same results on both windows 10 and on Linux using appimages. 

Digikam 8.2 works fine, but both 8.3 and 8.4 have this bug.

STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1. Create a 16 bit color tiff image using a color profile other than sRGB.
Using a profile with a large gamut will make the result obvious. The attachment
contains sample files.
2. Load the image into digikam

OBSERVED RESULT
Thumbnail colors are not correct. 

EXPECTED RESULT
Thumbnail colors should agree with digikam 8.2 thumbnail colors, and how the
image is displayed in preview.


SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Windows: 10
Qt Version: 6
Also Ubuntu with appimages, e.g., with digiKam-8.4.0-Qt6-x86-64.appimage

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
>From the attachment look at the screenshot "Thumbnails with
digiKam-8.4.0-Qt6-x86-64.appimage". All three thumbnails should look identical,
but one of them has desaturated colors. The offending image opens correctly in
preview, see "Preview image with digiKam-8.4.0-Qt6-x86-64.appimage"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to