https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302923
--- Comment #3 from Mario Frank <mario.fr...@uni-potsdam.de> --- Hey Wolfgang (if I may), I fear that my comment induced a quite too fatalistic view. Thus, I want to make that more precise. Depending on the way of implementation, the effort may be smaller or higher. Communicating the similarities to the album view is not that hard and would not take much time. But before doing some work in that point, some design decision must be found. As noted, introducing the ordering is not hard. I just want to know whether the devs accept introducing an ordering mechanism which does not use the database but the search query for example. This would not have such impact to the database size. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
