https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485770

--- Comment #4 from pallaswept <pallasw...@proton.me> ---
(In reply to Christoph Cullmann from comment #3)
> Hi, that is outside of our hands, if that needs to be improved, one must 
> report that upstream to Qt.

Thanks for looking at this for us Christoph!

I had a feeling that this might be upstream, as this issue appears to effect
various apps, eg https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468794

I took a look at Qt's bug reporting, but they ask for a lot of info that's a
bit above my capacity as an end-user. I am really not tooled to give them
things like example code to reproduce. They're pretty clear that the quality
(or lack thereof) that I could provide would result in a low likelihood of a
fix.

I wonder if maybe a KDE dev might be able to push this upstream? I'll do
whatever I can as far as user testing goes. I'm keen to help out (obviously,
I'm here!) but I think I'd do more harm than good by being the one to raise
this to Qt.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to