https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448234
--- Comment #37 from Jin Liu <ad.liu....@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #36) > So I think it's time to close this as RESOLVED UPSTREAM. The Qt folks have > put work into improving their SVG renderer, with some improvements landing > in 6.7, and others in 6.8, with still more to come. > > So far no feasible alternative to waiting for these fixes has emerged. That > makes it, in all practicality, purely an upstream issue, and thankfully our > upstream appears to be working to address it. Indeed. Meanwhile, do you think it would be good if we have an automatic test suite in, say KSvg, that collects all SVG icons that used to be rendered wrong, and compares the QSvg renderering results against, say, rsvg or resvg, via some image similarity metric? Maybe this should really be upstream, too. But there probably will be more regressions and KDE will be receiving bug reports, so I'd expect such tests to save some time in future bug investigation. And I'd like to implement such tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
