https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487997
--- Comment #7 from Eamonn Rea <eamonn...@protonmail.com> --- > Can you post an image of the "bad" quality screenshots and the screenshot > image files themselves? You can take a screenshot of spectacle using > spectacle with by running `spectacle -i` in the console. I can upload a rectangle region screenshot from my scaled display, which has poor quality. That part is no problem. I'm not sure what you're asking in the second part, though? Do you want me to take a screenshot of Spectacle taking a rectangle region screenshot, that is, initiate a region screenshot and then take a screenshot of Spectacle in this state? > Screen images with fractional scales should have decent quality too, but they > can never be perfect. What type of screen images are you referring to here? Single-window screenshots (Active Window, Window Under Cursor) and Current Monitor screenshots currently look perfectly fine on scaled and non-scaled displays and have the correct resolution. If there is a trade-off, I would say it is far better than "decent", more like "unnoticeable" :-) Windows in Current Monitor screenshots look identical in quality to a single-window screenshot of the same window. > - A region screenshot or all screens screenshot with multiple screens must be > a larger size than the logical size. We have to make tradeoffs and trading > file size for quality seemed acceptable. There is no way to just stitch the images together here with the same quality they have using Current Monitor screenshots? > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
