https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484758
--- Comment #11 from mahikeulbody <mcfaro...@gmail.com> --- There are three different aspects in this report : 1) The one highlighted in the title. As shown by the "?" I was not very sure of me and I wanted above all to draw attention about that. You convinced me that Digikam is doing the right thing. 2) As a normal user, we could expect the dates into the XMP-Exif-specific Properties sub-panel to be the same as shown in Exif Panel (which, as a normal user, we presume to be the ones from Exif metadata in the file). Probably a cosmetic point but it can be disturbing. 3) If you adjust time from Exif:Created (here 14:34:10) to all date fields, including Exif:Created, Exif:Original and Exif:Digitized, none Exif metadata are updated into the file (ie they exist in the file but are not updated). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
