https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482041
--- Comment #4 from radoslaw.snie...@protonmail.com --- How can I verify that this is in fact the RC? I grepped through all of my pam.d files and the faillock is required only on the pam.d/su which I doubt is used here. login, xscreensaver, xlock, vlock, i3lock nor any of sddm* files in pam.d don't mention the failllock. Any other module could be the culprit here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
