https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476018
wokim <mequer...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|UPSTREAM |--- Status|RESOLVED |REPORTED --- Comment #12 from wokim <mequer...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to fanzhuyifan from comment #11) > (In reply to Zamundaaa from comment #5) > > Yes. You can report the modes being generated despite the option being off, > > and the image being distorted with some of the generated modes at > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues. > > VRR not working with any generated modes is already reported at > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2185 > > Marking as resolved-upstream. There is a more specific issue there on this: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2985. But the bugs here are also multiple KDE bugs and not just an AMD bug, so it shouldn't be marked as resolved-upstream. > (In reply to wokim from comment #7) > > I also tried Gnome, and they list every refresh rate (all real and all fake > > refresh rates). And because they use decimals (e.g. 120.00 Hz and 119.94 Hz) > > I can distinguish between real and fake refresh rates. So it seems very > > useful to me if KDE (Display Configuration and kscreen-doctor) would also > > list all refresh rates (and not try hide duplicates) and also show decimals. > > I believe this is being tracked in > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431057 The refresh rates being improperly stored (bug 431057) isn't the only bug here. The other bugs here are: (1) Display Configuration hides refresh rates which are visible in kscreen-doctor, and (2) when you apply e.g. the real 120 Hz with kscreen-doctor it gets set back to the fake 120 Hz after a reboot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.