https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409325
--- Comment #8 from Alexander M. <apmichalopou...@protonmail.com> --- (In reply to fanzhuyifan from comment #7) > I do believe that having separate step sizes for the volume up/volume down > keys and scrolling is nice. With scrolling, it is very easy to scroll > continuously, so a smaller step size is desirable. But with hot keys, we > might want a bigger step size. > > Exposing both values as configuration options is probably an overkill > though. Overall I am quite happy with the current status -- with scrolling > the default of 1% is used, and with hotkeys users can configure the step > size. I would vote for closing this as intentional. This issue here though is not a disparity between using keyboard shortcuts and scrolling with the mouse, but a disparity between scrolling in one section of the UI and scrolling in a different section of the UI, both sections supposedly serving the exact same purpose/functionality, i.e. increasing/decreasing the volume by scrolling the mouse cursor over a slider. Scrolling behavior should be either uniform or configurable, and in any case absolutely predictable by the average non-technical user. Intentionally keeping this undocumented and non-configurable behavior would be a criminal thing to do UX-wise, and I'm saying that as someone who has grown used to this behavior and even finds it useful for some tasks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
