https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474601
--- Comment #2 from Andy Holmes <andrew.g.r.hol...@gmail.com> --- Can you be clearer about what you're actually proposing? This isn't the first time something like this has been proposed, but the implications are always rather vague. Are you suggesting... - Re-branding KDE Connect? If so, what is the benefit, given how recognizable it is after 10 years? - Using a common library or service base? If so, what language/platform/IPC are you suggesting? - Does your suggestion account for backwards-compatibility? If so, how? If not, what are the benefits and how do they offset obsoleting devices that won't be able to update? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
