https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
--- Comment #15 from Nick Nethercote <n.netherc...@gmail.com> --- The existing cache and branch simulations are very simplistic, and about 20 years out of date. I think hardware counters are a much better way of getting cache statistics. I recently made `--cache-sim=no` the default for this reason. I understand that the statistics you've added aren't available via hardware counters. But still I worry that using an unrealistic simulation as the foundation could lead to inaccurate results. Another thing: in the example output file you have lines like these: > 4,496,605,023 (51.80%) 47,791,341,277 (5545.9%) 127,816 (2819.7%) 147,917 > (23112.0%) 73,046 (1014.2%) 154,413 (203.7%) 8,192 (51.35%) > binary_search_test The percentages in the all the new columns (everything other than `Ir`) greatly exceed 100%, which seems wrong. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
