https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415599
Craig <craigfryer...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |craigfryer...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Craig <craigfryer...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #1)
> No, a date is not a parameter for facial recognition. What if old children's
> photos are scanned? Then we have a current date with an old photo.
>
> Maik
Not Before / Not After Date
I think a simplified method could be used to dramatically reduce the rate of
false recognition of faces is to filter the suggestions by the date the photo
was taken. A face would not be recognised if the photo was taken before or
after a set of dates entered into the faces profile. This would avoid faces
being suggested for a person that is no longer alive or before they were born.
The filter dates need not be the date of birth or death as it could simply be
the date before or after which that face would not appear in the pool of faces.
I agree that breaking up the training data by age category sounds helpful, but
other than when a person is a young baby this shouldn't help the AI as the
basic parameters of a face remain fairly similar throughout life.
I understand the issue with photos that have been scanned at a later date,
however scanned images should have their date taken changed to the date when
the original photo was taken. The information on when the photo was scanned can
be tagged or putting into the Meta data in some other way.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
