https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183

--- Comment #12 from Craig <craigfryer...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #2)
> Hi!
> 
> Maybe it also plays a big role if blurred faces are included in the
> recognition. I guess digiKam doesn't detect blurred faces to exclude them
> from face recognition? Blurred faces are still recognizable for a human. But
> the program then finds jackets, cakes, faces from the altar in the church,
> etc. The results are totally blurry.

Generally speaking I have found the face detection part to be very good with
few incorrect detection. Indeed when the face is low light Digikam does a
better job at identifying a face than I do.

I think you are correct about blurred faces are likely to cause problems for
the face recognition, which is likely to be the cause of the lower rate
recognition or incorrect suggestions as more pictures are added and matched. I
hope that the work on this code will allow the selection of the reference
pictures that the recognition is to be based against. It would be interesting
if we could see the match confidence score or even the variation between the
reference pictures.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to