https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469146
--- Comment #3 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> ---
I tried down loading and applying the patch from Paul to the Valgrind mainline.
Head of the tree was:
commit d97fed7c3e4aa7c910dfa0b6c5de12fd6cf08155 (tag: VALGRIND_3_21_0,
origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Author: Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org>
Date: Fri Apr 28 17:30:04 2023 +0200
-> 3.21.0 final
With the this commit, i.e. no patch, I get the following results from make
regtest on Power 10.
== 714 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0
stdou\
tB failures, 2 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/rfcomm (stderr)
massif/tests/new-cpp (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
With the patch for massif to filter_IPs hadles inline functions, I am seeing
new failures on Power 10.
= 714 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdou\
tB failures, 6 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/rfcomm (stderr)
massif/tests/alloc-fns-B (post)
massif/tests/deep-B (post)
massif/tests/deep-C (post)
massif/tests/deep-D (post)
massif/tests/new-cpp (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
The diff output for new-cpp looks unchanged from the base run (i.e. no patch).
The diff output for deep-B is as follows:
more deep-B.post.diff
--- deep-B.post.exp 2023-05-01 16:49:31.458553002 -0400
+++ deep-B.post.out 2023-05-01 18:15:57.327511581 -0400
@@ -46,13 +46,15 @@
8 3,264 3,264 3,200 64
0
9 3,672 3,672 3,600 72
0
98.04% (3,600B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns,
etc.
-->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: a5 (deep.c:23)
- ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: a4 (deep.c:24)
- ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: a3 (deep.c:25)
- ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: a2 (deep.c:26)
- ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: a1 (deep.c:27)
- ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: main (deep.c:35)
-
+->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: a11 (deep.c:17)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: a10 (deep.c:18)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: a9 (deep.c:19)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: a8 (deep.c:20)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: a7 (deep.c:21)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: a6 (deep.c:22)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: a5 (deep.c:23)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: a4 (deep.c:24)
+
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B)
stacks(B)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
The output for deep-C at first glance looks identical.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
