https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466566
--- Comment #13 from Eric <m...@ericvanblokland.nl> --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #12) > Yes, that does sound like a good solution that would solve other problems as > well. Re-opening. I'm very glad to hear that. I've been thinking about how this feature could work. I don't use a lot of different widgets so I may be overlooking some use cases but I have a suggestion on how this could work, generalized: 1. There must be some sane minimum size (width for horizontal panels, height for vertical panels) so you can't make a widget disappear. 2. Widgets should probably be able to specify their own minimum size, I guess based on some scale against the other axis. 3. Widgets might want to specify a default size, again based on some scale, larger than their minimum, but some "sane" size to match user expectation/design goals. 4. Widgets might want to specify a maximum size if scaling beyond a certain ratio doesn't make sense or isn't supported. 5. Widgets should be allowed to grow beyond their minimum size (either their advertised minimum size or the user specified minimum size), see my System Tray example above. 6. Depending on how well this all works in general (how well do most widgets handle/scale with the extra surface area) widgets should be able to either opt-in or opt-out of this feature. To me it seems a minimum size is the way to go, but maybe someone else could come up with an example where a "user specified maximum" size would be preferred. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
