https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461866
--- Comment #1 from Jack <ostrof...@users.sourceforge.net> --- Actually, there ARE splits - but only one, and so the transaction is not balanced. A normal, non-split transaction actually has two splits: one for the money moving in or out of the account, and the other for where the money went to or came from, usually a category, but another account in case the transaction is a transfer. This is an unfortunate confusion based on use of the term "split." I believe that warning was added to the consistency check to catch a different type of problem, but it also catches these. I suppose you can think of this as a side effect of KMM essentially enforcing double-entry bookkeeping, and also the use of Accounts to represent Categories internally. Within a transaction, all funds coming from somewhere also have to go somewhere. What is your use case for having transactions without a category? In my experience, almost all such transactions have been imported and not yet accepted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
