https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411877
--- Comment #21 from lo...@kde.bt.alestan.publicvm.com --- That is correct. I cannot think of any use case that is made *worse* by this change, but it does not solve the underlying problem. I'm not sure if the additional code complexity is worth catching one, likely rare, case. We could write a dozen similar-sized patches and still not actually solve the issue (I do not think any heuristic can exist to handle the 2-identical-screens issue). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
