https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=451137
neromaver...@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |neromaver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from neromaver...@gmail.com ---
The "Connection Name" field needs to be an acceptable Wireguard interface name.
So using "wg0" as the connection name will succeed in creating the interface.
IMO this is a poor GUI implementation. Closing the dialog and having to restart
on a failure aside, the "Connection name" field should be reserved for a
personal arbitrary name for this connection.
If Wireguard requires a device name such as wg0, wg1, etc. Then an additional
field needs to be added to specify which wg interface number this connection
uses. Either that, or automatically set the interface name, taking it out of
the users hands.
I want to note, this is not a typical behavior of how connection configurations
work. When I name my LAN "Laptop NIC", I don't see ...8: 'Laptop NIC':
<BROADCAST,MULTICAST,U... As my interface name when I run 'ip a'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
