https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450676

Brian <aeon.descrip...@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aeon.descrip...@gmail.com

--- Comment #4 from Brian <aeon.descrip...@gmail.com> ---
I've also found this jarring.  I think it's important for visual consistency to
use the animation that is normally used for switching desktops.  This matters
even more when mixing a desktop arrangement that is spatially presented during
switching -- as with sliding desktops when arranged as a grid.  ..and once
someone does Desktop Cube in the new framework, it'll be helpful there, too.

But consistency matters a lot, and having a consistent animation makes the
association on a visceral level that 'desktop switching' is happening, and
happening normally.

The animations can both be done, and there are a number of reasonable ways to
do that -- playing both chained together as an InOutCubic (if that's possible)
would make sense.  But also, if mixing is possible, that could be done -- the
windows return to their normal positions as that desktop slides away.  Even
playing one right after the other (as an option) would be ok.

In any case, I suppose you could consider this another vote in favor of
addressing this issue.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to