https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452442
--- Comment #4 from florianhilgenb...@googlemail.com ---
Thank you for elaborating.
I am locking via Auto start instantly after Autologin. That for first user
interaction is to enter password, thatfor I don't care what happens after
login, I care about after unlocking. Let me elaborate since I got a feeling
to not have explained myself very well.

Desired Process:
1. Auto login, kwallet locked
2. Autostart triggers loginctl lock-session
3. User unlocks from lockscreen
4. Kwallet gets password from the unlock process.

I can't see how that is another security issue than unlock the wallet upon
manual login.

If this is still declined, I won't force it anymore. Thank you :)

On Mon, 11 Apr 2022, 20:36 Nate Graham, <bugzilla_nore...@kde.org> wrote:

> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452442
>
> --- Comment #3 from Nate Graham <n...@kde.org> ---
> Theoretically yes, but to implement that we would have to punch a security
> hole
> in the screen locker that would make it less secure. Also it wouldn't
> solve the
> problem because the lock screen and the login screens are separate things.
> The
> wallet still wouldn't unlock at *login*.
>
> Really, if you have auto-login on, I'm not sure how much sense it makes to
> use
> a lock screen at all. Clearly security is not a major concern in such a use
> case. :)
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You reported the bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to