https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442191
--- Comment #12 from tomtomtomreportin...@gmail.com --- Now I'm wondering if it's really necessary to have "soft" cut/copy operations, at least as the default operations... Having Cut (Sharp) as a separate action seems a bit unnecessary if the user has already chosen to use aliased selections, especially as Cut (sharp) doesn't have the same fallbacks as normal Cut (for cutting layers etc.). Additional confusion might occur when both normal cut and sharp cut will in practice produce a soft cut when the selection is antialiased, while with aliased selections they work as they would convey. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
