https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97420

--- Comment #10 from Ian <i...@zti.co.za> ---
Hi

I took a look at your proposal, thanks.

I then realised what part of the problem is ... there are two different Use
Cases for KCharSelect:

1. probably the original one, which probably dates all the way back to the
similar program on Windows 3.1 ... you're typing something, need a ß character,
and don't know the alt-xxxx/whatever code for it, so you fire up a Character
Select program to find it, copy and paste. This use case predates Unicode.

2. Other use, (eg me) is to see which glyphs are in a font, and what they look
like. This is to help in deciding which font to use for a particular job.

In use case 1, you may be happy with QT/system substituting a glyph from a
different font. In use case 2, you need to know exactly what's what. Use case 2
is actually "Font Browser" rather than Character Select, but the existing font
browser on KDE is way underpowered for proper investigation of a font. (I guess
it's also very old and possibly pre-unicode, where there were only a handful of
glyphs in a font).

So yes, your proposals will work for me, and are a definite improvement. My
only issue is what is the default view, and that I suppose depends on whether
you are targeting Use Case 1 or Use Case 2 .... I would prefer the greyed out
as default, but I accept that those in Use Case 1 would prefer the other view.

Thanks, Ian

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to