https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445801
--- Comment #16 from Antonio Rojas <aro...@archlinux.org> --- (In reply to Ahmad Samir from comment #15) > If am reading this correctly, the issue is supposedly fixed by using > pam_umask.so, which is probably what ArchLinux is already doing (but I don't > know for sure). No, we're not. I will comment on the relevant downstream report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
