https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446759
--- Comment #2 from Emmet O'Neill <emmetoneill....@gmail.com> --- > [1.] I find the "non-commercial license" to be a bit vague as far as > software licensing goes. Krita is obviously free and open source software > licensed under the GPLv3, but it is also available through stores on various > platforms as a means of broadening our user base and creating a way to > support development. So, does that count as "commercial" or not? Because of > that, we would probably be wise to contact the owners of this code and get > an explicit answer (and permission) before using any of their code. > > I could be over-thinking it a bit, but I think there's an element of risk > involved with making use of code with vague licenses. I guess I was actually under-thinking it. Tiar tells me that the source code in this case is just plain incompatible with GPLv3, so it would need to be re-implemented in a GPLv3 compatible license based on the research paper. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
