https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442784
--- Comment #8 from Edmund Laugasson <edmund.laugas...@protonmail.ch> --- Thank you, I appreciate your efforts! This is definitely useful. But sometimes it is not possible to know, what area to select. E.g. I try to get screenshot from certain dialog or part of it, that will appear quickly into unpredictable place on screen. Then I would like to take even several screenshots but Spectacle keeps only one screenshot :( Also in case, where certain process is going on quite quickly that cannot be paused (e.g. installation) and I would like to take series of screenshots but I can't, as Spectacle keeps only one screenshot. I guess I need to file next feature request. Besides, Shutter does keep also previous screenshots as much as needed. I can also configure to them save automatically or not, also choose file format, location, etc. Now you can say again, that I want too much. Sorry, but Shutter has it and this is nothing extra, but belongs to basic screenshotting workflow. Sorry of comparing with Shutter, but they really understood the workflow connected with screenshotting. As Shutter is also free and open-source software, then you can use their source code and don't need to write from scratch. In that way you can get features implemented quicker with less effort and use already reviewed code, that contains already less (if at all) bugs. This in turn can save time and efforts of hunting bugs, when to use already reviewed code. This is the power of free and open-source software. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.