https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=254779
--- Comment #4 from Rolf Eike Beer <k...@opensource.sf-tec.de> --- > I didn't change the storage model (the part that fails the "wtf test") > because > I thought it best to limit my changes to those actually necessary to > add the > feature. But since you mentioned it, I will look into changing the > model, and > if it works out, I'll include both changes in the revised patch. Please do that in 2 patches for easier review, in any order that fits your needs. > m_expiry was already declared as a private field of SearchResult; it > was just > never used before. Sorry, I was looking at the frameworks branch, where it got removed for exactly that reason ;) Eike -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
