https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435365
Tiar <tamtamy.tym...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tamtamy.tym...@gmail.com
Status|REPORTED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INTENTIONAL
--- Comment #4 from Tiar <tamtamy.tym...@gmail.com> ---
It sounds like it's intentional behaviour. @Squeaky if you get confused about
it, maybe you could start a discussion on krita-artists.org on how to change
the design to make this behaviour more obvious, so users won't get confused.
"Erase filling seems counter intuitive to me especially when there is already a
clear tool that does just that."
This is not true though, Fill Tool has lots of different options which makes it
much more powerful in the Erase mode than the Clear feature. Clear just clears
the whole selection; Fill Tool can for example erase only parts with the same
color, or clear the whole selection, or it can erase just one part of the
selection if your selection has multiple parts (like if you selected a few
rectangles at once).
And the selection is irrelevant; Fill Tool can work without a selection, too.
(Clear can work without a selection too, clearing a whole layer; but Fill Tool
has options that finetune its behaviour to only clear what you want to clear).
Basically, Fill Tool is more advanced than just Clear, so we can't remove the
Erase mode from Fill Tool without removing functionality from Krita (which
would be bad, since there are always users who use the functionality, even if
you don't use it).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
