https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382645
Michael <mz-...@mailbox.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|5.6.0 |7.2.0
--- Comment #4 from Michael <mz-...@mailbox.org> ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #3)
> Maik,
>
> What do you think about this old entry ? Why we need to generate xmp sidecar
> without XML packet description ? What the gain ? What's about the
> interoperability with other application ?
>
> Removing XML definition can reduce compatibility after all. For me this file
> must be resolved as WONT FIX...
>
> Gilles
Gilles,
please don't mix up XMP packet wrappers and XML headers. These are two
different things. Unfortunately, the Exiv2 documentation for the flag
omitPacketWrapper is wrong in this regard ('Omit the XML packet wrapper.').
This flag omits the XMP packet wrapper (there is no XML packet wrapper).
A XMP packet wrapper is intended for embedding XMP data into binary files and
starts with:
<?xpacket begin=
For XMP sidecar files you should omit this wrapper and write a XML header
instead - before writing the XMP data:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
This XML header is missing in the current digiKam release.
Michael
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
