https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434164

            Bug ID: 434164
           Summary: Some proposals about face management
           Product: digikam
           Version: 7.2.0
          Platform: Other
                OS: Linux
            Status: REPORTED
          Severity: wishlist
          Priority: NOR
         Component: Faces-Workflow
          Assignee: digikam-bugs-n...@kde.org
          Reporter: cyberb...@gmx.de
  Target Milestone: ---

I used picasa before (which is a good reference for its UI for
face-management!), and like to tag thousands of faces with digikam. Some things
I would like to be improved:

- The internal face-recognition engine will output some probabilities how
similar is a face to an existing face, I guess? At the moment, if I go through
the "unknown faces" section, always the last selected Face-Tag is preselected.
Perhaps it could prefill with the Tag with the highest probability above a
certain threshold? That may speed up things. Also for the drop-down list,
sorting by probability. This could be an alternative option, the current
behaviour makes also sense in some cases.

- When detection is in progress, the "Unknown faces" section is "jumpy", so
when I currently are typing on a face-tag-input-field, somehow suddenly another
face is selected with the input (this seems like a bug)

- it would make sense for the faceview to be able in the preview-pictures-mode
to switch between the (currently only available) show-face-only and
show-full-picture mode

- it would make sense, to have an "and" selection in the faces-tree-view in the
left, so if you control-select multiple face-tags, show people together on a
picture, which is a very common search I think. I found that is only partially
possible via filters (difficult for all images in collection), or the search
(also very complicated)

- The face-tag-tree-view at the left looks ugly, because the face-preview
pictures have different width (it gets worse, if you choose a bigger-preview
size like 64px, I use 48px at the moment). At least the face-name should be all
same vertical aligned. Also the left margin seems a bit too large (waste of
space)

- As last point: some few faces have a good recognition (the proposals mostly
are correct), but for some faces, almost every proposal is wrong, so there
seems to be much room for improvement for the recognition. Also many existing
faces are not proposed at all (with accuracy=70%)

Thanks for your work at digikam, and for the new face-backend, AI gives a nice
boost to such things.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to