https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430907
--- Comment #3 from Andrius Štikonas <andr...@stikonas.eu> --- (In reply to Andrius Štikonas from comment #2) > (In reply to Mattia from comment #0) > > It would be nice to have kpmcore support for exfatprogs now that Linux > > Kernel has exfat support. > > Though, I don't know if it can co-exist alongside with exfat-utils support > > or one exclude the other. For example, they share the same `mkfs.exfat`, but > > I don't know if the two implementations use the same syntax. > > > > Fedora cannot ship exfat-utils, but has recently gained exfatprogs in its > > repos. > > Slightly unfortunately, mkfs.exfat do not share the same syntax. They use > completely different command line arguments. > > I guess I need to detect which one it is by checking commands line flags in > mkfs.exfat output. There is an easier way to distinguish those. exfat-utils install mkexfatfs and then symlink it to mkfs.exfat while exfatprogs install mkfs.exfat directly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
