https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391748
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Schlarb <alexander-kde@ninetailed.ninja> --- > I've thought about doing something about it but I don't think it's worth the > effort at this point, especially considering how there's both PySide (Qt for > Python now) and PyQt5. Could you explain the difference between PySide and PyQt5 and why I've never seen a Python Qt application using the former (although it supposedly is the “official” binding)? > It would surely be possible to have an extra org.kde.python.Platform kind of > thing. Or an extension should be possible as well, haven't explored this > approach, it would be welcome if someone did. A separate platform would be overkill, but a runtime extension could be decent compromise there. Although I was secretly hoping to have it in the main platform image, as Python support in FDO/GNOME runtimes is available OOTB and as a Python programmer I of course love that. :-P > The biggest problem with basing the platform is that we'd have to choose > against Qt WebKit and Qt WebEngine, which is another crazy place that adds > complexity. I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean with “basing” here? QtWebEngine/QtWebKit are not part of this and at least PyQt5 allows building the Python binding for QtWebEngine separately. (OT: Regarding that, I had been privately wondering if wouldn't make sense to have these as runtime extensions [with their respective Python bindings].) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
