https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427395
--- Comment #1 from lth...@up.com --- My investigation of the issue pointed me at a bad metaObject within the devnull NoDebugStream (derived from QIODevice). Following that trail to gstreamer/debug_p.h led me to notice that the Q_OBJECT macro in NoDebugStream's definition is commented out (in master, even!), which looks wrong since QIODevice is a QObject in the normal case (the only way it isn't is if QT_NO_QOBJECT is defined when qiodevice.h is #included). Is there a good reason for NoDebugStream to be defined the way it is, or am I onto something here? (NB: https://marcmutz.wordpress.com/effective-qt/subclassing/ seems to agree with what I am seeing that Q_OBJECT should have been there all along...) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
