https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426198
--- Comment #2 from Leonard Lausen <leon...@lausen.nl> --- Thank you for elaborating David. Where are the dependencies that also require X anyways tracked? If they aren't tracked, would it be sensible to track them in this bug report? Given the existing runtime support for disabling xwayland, this seems to be mainly an issue with the build system and the dependencies. On September 5, 2020 8:14:01 AM PDT, David Edmundson <bugzilla_nore...@kde.org> wrote: > >https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426198 > >David Edmundson <k...@davidedmundson.co.uk> changed: > > What |Removed |Added >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Resolution|--- |LATER > CC| |k...@davidedmundson.co.uk > Status|REPORTED |RESOLVED > >--- Comment #1 from David Edmundson <k...@davidedmundson.co.uk> --- >Compiling against X and using it on wayland only are very different topics. > >You can already use kwin only for wayland. Simply don't pass the --xwayland >parameter. > >The headers and linked libraries are relatively tiny and our dependencies also >require X anyway. We ultimately plan to slowly phase some of that out but not >in the very near future. > >-- >You are receiving this mail because: >You reported the bug. >You are on the CC list for the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
