https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425156
--- Comment #8 from Robert Hairgrove <c...@roberthairgrove.com> --- (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #4) > (In reply to Robert Hairgrove from comment #3) > > Is there any reason why the type must be a UMLClassifier? > > Types may be classes and therefore need to be a UMLClassifier The problem is, we can select a template from the "type" list for the types of lots of different things. Everything else in the list is either a datatype or a class name. Indeed, the type of a template parameter is "class", unless some integral expression or type with external linkage is specified. So template parameters SHOULD be considered classifiers, but they aren't -- at least not in Umbrello. What I am looking at now is how to properly load and save these in the XMI file. I've looked at XMI files produced by other applications, for example Modelio, and I have the XMI reference as a PDF file. But every other UML tool uses a different format. How interchangeable does this have to be? Code generation and reverse engineering needs to be looked at here as well. Since templates have been part of UML for some time, I don't see why we cannot make this work somehow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
