https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424818
--- Comment #6 from Stefan <thaqe9rd...@temp.mailbox.org> --- (Deepl-Übersetzung) Ok, a bit difficult to judge, because I don't know which meta fields are actually displayed in digicam or filled in the metadata editor. It would be helpful to understand if the technical metadata name was visible in the editor (e.g. as a mouse overlay). Or also, at which time and in which direction data are / must be converted. I understand the exiv2 table in such a way that the fields Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized <-> Xmp.xmp.CreateDate should be identical - namely the digitization date! The creation date would be the combination: Exif.Photo.DateTimeOriginal <-> Xmp.photoshop.DateCreated. Is it like that in digicam? Why then (in the .xmp file)? exif:DateTimeDigitized="2020-02-02T02:02:02+00:00" xmp:CreateDate="2020-01-01T01:01:01" The right one would be after exiv2: exif:DateTimeDigitized="2020-02-02T02:02:02+00:00" xmp:CreateDate="2020-02-02T02:02:02" and exif:DateTimeOriginal="2020-01-01T01:01:01" photoshop:DateCreated="2020-01-01T01:01:01" Thanks for your efforts and answers so far :-) And a big praise to the developers of Digikam. Despite some shortcomings and possibilities for improvement, it fulfills my ideas best, even in contrast to commercial programs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
